Abstract
Abstract. This paper derives a closed-form representation for the characteristic function of the sum , where and are Poisson random variables connected through an arbitrary bivariate copula. While the sum of independent Poisson variables remains Poisson-distributed, dependence—introduced via a discrete copula—fundamentally alters the distributional structure of . Using the discrete version of Sklar’s theorem and a difference-operator representation of copulas for count data, we establish an exact series formula for the characteristic function of under completely general dependence. Furthermore, we develop explicit analytic expressions for three Archimedean copulas (Clayton, Frank, and Gumbel) and provide a numerically tractable representation for the Gaussian copula using the distributional transform approach. Numerical experiments confirm that different forms of dependence create distinct signatures in the characteristic function, highlighting its usefulness for modeling dependent count data in insurance, hydrology, and reliability applications.
References
1. Johnson, Kemp, Kotz. (2005) Univariate Discrete Distributions.
2. Karlis, Ntzoufras (2003). Analysis of multivariate Poisson data.
3. Joe, H. (1997). Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts.
4. Sklar, A. (1959). Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions.
5. Nelsen, R. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas.
6. Genest, Neslehova (2007). A primer on copulas for count data.
7. Denuit & Lambert (2005). Actuarial copula models.
8. Mesiar (2005). Discrete copulas and aggregation.
9. Durante, Sempi (2015). Principles of Copula Theory.
10. Kocherlakota, Kocherlakota. Bivariate Discrete Distributions.
11. Nikoloulopoulos (2013). Gaussian copula for discrete data.
12. Yan (2007). Copulas in statistical models.
13. Barndorff-Nielsen et al. (1992). Characterization of distributions via CFs.
14. Lloyd-Smith (2007). Overdispersion in count models.
15. Genest & MacKay (1986). Archimedean copulas.
16. McNeil & Nešlehová (2009). Archimedean generators and dependence.
17. McNeil, Frey, Embrechts (2015). Quantitative Risk Management.
18. Press et al. (2007). Numerical Recipes.
19. Abate & Whitt (1992). Numerical inversion of transforms.