Abstract
Abstract: Quantitative metallographic evaluation of welded steels remains largely dependent on manual interpretation, resulting in limited reproducibility, strong operator dependency, and insufficient morphological characterization of critical microstructural constituents. In particular, the reliable identification of martensite–austenite (M/A) constituents, acicular ferrite (AF), and ferrite with secondary phases (FS) in weld metal microstructures presents a persistent challenge under conventional optical microscopy. This paper presents a robust and fully automated computer vision–based methodology implemented in C++/OpenCV for objective phase segmentation and quantitative analysis of etched weld metal micrographs.
References
1. Brätz, O., Böllinghaus, T., Kannengiesser, T. Quantitative analysis of martensite–austenite constituents in ferritic steel weld metals. Welding in the World, 67 (2023) 1223–1236.
2. International Institute of Welding (IIW). Recommendations for the Classification of Ferritic Steel Weld Metal Microstructures. IIW Doc. IX-1533-88, Paris, 2017.
3. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E. Digital Image Processing. 4th ed., Pearson, New York, 2018.
4. Самандаров И.Р., Каримов С.Я. АВТОМАТИЗИРОВАННЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ТОЛЩИНЫ СЛОЯ И ФАЗОВОГО СОСТАВА МИКРОСТРУКТУРЫ УПРОЧНЁННОГО ЧУГУНА, ПОЛУЧЕННОГО МЕТОДОМ LOST FOAM CASTING // Universum: технические науки : электрон. научн. журн. 2025. 9(138).
5. Samandarov I.R., Karimov S.Y. Chugun mikrostrukturasining faza tarkibi va qatlam qalinligini avtomatlashtirilgan tahlili. ZAMONAVIY TA'LIMDA FAN VA INNOVATSION, Tom 3. №12. 2025