DESIGNING AN AI-DRIVEN MOBILE VOCABULARY FRAMEWORK FOR UNIVERSITY EFL LEARNERS
Yuklab olish|Download|Скачать

Keywords

Keywords: mobile-assisted language learning (MALL); artificial intelligence; vocabulary acquisition; adaptive spaced repetition; EFL; higher education; personalization; conversational agents.

How to Cite

Azimova Muborak Nodir qizi. “DESIGNING AN AI-DRIVEN MOBILE VOCABULARY FRAMEWORK FOR UNIVERSITY EFL LEARNERS”. World Scientific Research Journal 54, no. 1 (July 26, 2026): 15–27. Accessed August 22, 2026. https://openresearch-hub.com/index.php/wsrj/article/view/2642.

Abstract

Abstract. Vocabulary knowledge is a decisive factor in the academic success of university students who study English as a foreign language (EFL), yet classroom instruction alone rarely provides the volume, distribution, and depth of lexical practice that acquisition research shows to be necessary. This conceptual article proposes the AI-Driven Mobile Vocabulary (AIMV) Framework, an integrated design model for mobile vocabulary learning environments powered by artificial intelligence. Drawing on vocabulary acquisition theory, cognitive psychology, and two decades of research on mobile-assisted language learning (MALL), the article first derives eight design principles concerning lexical selection, distributed retrieval, depth of processing, the balance of learning conditions, adaptive scaffolding, motivation, teacher orchestration, and ethical use of AI. It then presents a four-layer functional architecture — a learner model layer, a lexical content layer, an adaptive delivery engine, and an assessment–analytics layer — supported by two cross-cutting strands addressing engagement and governance. A weekly learning cycle integrating the mobile application with classroom instruction is described, with illustrations from English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses for economics students. The article concludes with implementation considerations for higher education institutions and an agenda for the empirical validation of the framework. The AIMV Framework is intended to guide application developers, curriculum designers, teachers, and researchers who seek to move beyond generic vocabulary applications toward theoretically grounded, personalized, and pedagogically embedded mobile learning.

Yuklab olish|Download|Скачать

References

1. Bibauw, S., François, T., & Desmet, P. (2019). Discussing with a computer to practice a foreign language: Research synthesis and conceptual framework of dialogue-based CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 827–877.

2. Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20.

3. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.

4. Chen, C.-M., & Chung, C.-J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–645.

5. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.

6. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.

7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

8. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.

9. Fryer, L., & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14.

10. Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3–17.

11. Heil, C. R., Wu, J. S., Lee, J. J., & Schmidt, T. (2016). A review of mobile language learning applications: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. The EuroCALL Review, 24(2), 32–50.

12. Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257.

13. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550.

14. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.

15. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.

16. Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878–919.

17. Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311.

18. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

19. Nakata, T. (2011). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 17–38.

20. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82.

21. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

22. Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.

23. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.

24. Pavlik, P. I., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(2), 101–117.

25. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.

26. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363.

27. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.

28. Settles, B., & Meeder, B. (2016). A trainable spaced repetition model for language learning. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1848–1858). Association for Computational Linguistics.

29. Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.

30. Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education.

31. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

33. Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33–69.

34. Zou, D., Huang, Y., & Xie, H. (2021). Digital game-based vocabulary learning: Where are we and where are we going? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 751–777.