Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Annotation: This article examines the effectiveness of applying innovative pedagogical technologies in chemistry lessons within general secondary and higher education institutions. The study analyzes the theoretical foundations of innovative teaching approaches, including digital technologies, interactive methods, problem-based learning, STEAM integration, flipped classroom models, and gamification. The research evaluates their influence on students’ cognitive activity, motivation, academic performance, and practical competence in chemistry. Based on experimental observations, survey results, and comparative analysis, the article demonstrates that innovative pedagogical technologies significantly enhance students’ conceptual understanding, critical thinking, and scientific inquiry skills.
References
1. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
2. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
4. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
5. Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15.
6. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
8. Roehrig, G. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H.-H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K–12 engineering standards on STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31–44.
9. Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: Emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 758–768.
10. Wieman, C. (2014). Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8319–8320.