Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Abstract: This article examines the dual education system in Germany, which is widely regarded as one of the most effective vocational training models in the world, and explores the possibilities of adapting its key principles and mechanisms to the educational context of Uzbekistan. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the structural, organizational, and pedagogical features of the German dual system, including the roles of employers, vocational schools, chambers of commerce, and government agencies. Through a comparative methodology, the article identifies the strengths and challenges of the German model and evaluates the current state of vocational education in Uzbekistan, particularly in the context of training future preschool educators. The findings suggest that selective adaptation of dual education elements—such as strengthened employer engagement, competency-based curricula, mentorship frameworks, and quality assurance mechanisms—can significantly enhance the professional preparation of future educators in Uzbekistan. The article concludes with practical recommendations for implementing dual education principles within the Uzbek vocational education system.
References
1. Baethge, M., & Wolter, A. (2015). The German skill formation model in transition: From dual system of VET to higher education? Journal of Labour Market Research, 48(2), 97–112.
2. Deissinger, T. (2015). The German dual vocational education and training system as ‘good practice’? Local Economy, 30(5), 557–567.
3. Djuraev, R. X. (2019). Modernization of vocational education in Uzbekistan: Current trends and perspectives. Tashkent: Fan.
4. Euler, D. (2013). Germany’s dual vocational training system: A model for other countries? Bertelsmann Stiftung.
5. Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB). (2023). Report on vocational education and training 2023. Bonn: BIBB.
6. Gessler, M., & Howe, F. (2015). From the reality of work to grounded work-based learning in German vocational education and training. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(3), 214–238.
7. GIZ. (2022). Dual education in Central Asia: Lessons learned and perspectives. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit.
8. Muslimov, N. A. (2018). Competency-based approaches in professional teacher education. Tashkent: TDPU.
9. Oberhuemer, P., Schreyer, I., & Neuman, M. J. (2010). Professionals in early childhood education and care systems: European profiles and perspectives. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
10. OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
11. Pilz, M. (2016). Typologies in comparative vocational education: Existing models and a new approach. Vocations and Learning, 9(3), 295–314.
12. Rauschenbach, T., & Riedel, B. (2016). Germany’s early childhood workforce: Developments in staffing and qualification. Early Years, 36(4), 398–412.
13. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Law on Education. Tashkent: National Database of Legal Documents.
14. UNESCO. (2022). Global Education Monitoring Report: Deepening the debate on those still left behind. Paris: UNESCO.
15. World Bank. (2023). Uzbekistan: Education sector review. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.