Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Abstract. This article examines the critical relationship between design theory and methodology in contemporary design practice. It explores how theoretical frameworks inform methodological approaches and vice versa, proposing an integrated model for more effective design problem-solving. Through analysis of key theories (including systems thinking, human-centered design, and critical design) and methodologies (such as design thinking, double diamond, and agile design), the article identifies gaps between conceptual understanding and practical application. A case study demonstrates how theoretical awareness enhances methodological choices in real projects. The article concludes with recommendations for design education and practice that better integrate theory and methodology.
References
1. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer.
2. Dorst, K. (2015). Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. MIT Press.
3. Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Routledge.
4. Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things. Revised edition. Basic Books.
5. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
6. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.
7. Kolko, J. (2015). Design Strategy in Practice. Rosenfeld Media.
8. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14.