LANGUAGE LEARNING PROFILES AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT
Yuklab olish|Download|Скачать

Keywords

Keywords: Language Learner Profiles, Teaching Philosophy, Differentiated Instruction, Second Language Acquisition (SLA), Affective Filter, Critical Period Hypothesis, Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)

How to Cite

Mirhonov Kahramon. “LANGUAGE LEARNING PROFILES AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT”. PEDAGOGS INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL 106, no. 1 (May 26, 2026): 103–108. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://openresearch-hub.com/index.php/ped/article/view/2210.

Abstract

Abstract: This paper looks at how different student personalities and feelings affect language learning. It also shows how a teacher can change their methods to help every student succeed. The study takes place at an academic lyceum under the University of World Economy and Diplomacy in Uzbekistan. The teacher examines his two 15-year-old intermediate level English learning students with different home languages: one speaks mostly Russian, and the other speaks mostly Kazakh.

The work analyzes how each student's family background, personality, and past experiences affect their confidence and motivation. It looks closely at their specific problems with English grammar and pronunciation. For example, one student suffers from speaking anxiety, while the other makes frequent grammar mistakes. The study uses famous language theories, including Stephen Krashen’s ideas about input and anxiety, and modern views on the critical age for learning languages.

To help both students, the teacher uses a mix of practical methods. These include Task-Based Language Teaching, Communicative Language Teaching, and step-by-step guidance. Finally, the work provides the conclusion explaining that classrooms must be safe, friendly, and flexible spaces where lessons match the real-life goals of the students.

Yuklab olish|Download|Скачать

References

Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the Critical Period

Hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012596

Kinginger, C. (2001). i + 1 ≠ ZPD. Foreign Language Annals, 34(5), 417-425.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02081.x

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman Group UK Ltd.

Muñoz, C. (2019). A new look at "age": Young and old L2 learners. In J. W. Schwieter & A.

Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 430-450). Cambridge

University Press.

Singleton, D., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2018). L2 acquisition in childhood, adulthood and old age:

Misreported and under-researched dimensions of the age factor. Journal of Second Language Studies, 1(2), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00003.sin

Waller, L., Wethers, K., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). A critical praxis: Narrowing the gap between identity, theory, and practice. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.256

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.