XODIMNING MEHNAT HUQUQLARI BUZILGANDA MA’NAVIY ZIYONNI KOMPENSATSIYA QILISH MASALALARI
Yuklab olish|Download|Скачать

Keywords

Kalit so‘zlar: mehnat huquqi, ma’naviy ziyon, kompensatsiya, xodimning huquqlari, mehnat nizosi, ishga tiklash, sud amaliyoti.

How to Cite

Shokirov Kozimjon Zokirjon o‘g‘li. “XODIMNING MEHNAT HUQUQLARI BUZILGANDA MA’NAVIY ZIYONNI KOMPENSATSIYA QILISH MASALALARI”. PEDAGOGS INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL 105, no. 1 (May 2, 2026): 20–33. Accessed September 14, 2026. https://openresearch-hub.com/index.php/ped/article/view/1963.

Abstract

Annotatsiya. Mazkur maqolada xodimning mehnat huquqlari buzilganda ma’naviy ziyonni kompensatsiya qilish institutining nazariy va amaliy jihatlari tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning predmeti mehnat huquqlarining buzilishi oqibatida xodimga yetkazilgan ma’naviy va jismoniy aziyatlarning huquqiy bahosi, ularni kompensatsiya qilish asoslari, sud tomonidan miqdorni belgilash mezonlari hamda ushbu institutni takomillashtirish masalalaridan iborat. Tadqiqotning dolzarbligi shundaki, O‘zbekiston Respublikasining amaldagi mehnat qonunchiligida ma’naviy ziyonni kompensatsiya qilishga doir qoidalar mavjud bo‘lsa-da, ularni qo‘llash amaliyotida miqdorni aniqlash, isbotlash, ayb va sababiy bog‘lanishni baholash, shuningdek turli huquqbuzarliklar bo‘yicha yagona yondashuvni shakllantirish bilan bog‘liq masalalar saqlanib qolmoqda. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi, Mehnat kodeksi, Fuqarolik kodeksi, Oliy sud Plenumining 2000-yil 28-apreldagi 7-son va 2023-yil 20-noyabrdagi 26-son qarorlari hamda mahalliy va xorijiy ilmiy adabiyotlar o‘rganildi.

Yuklab olish|Download|Скачать

References

1. Hamrokulov, B. M. (2024). Theoretical and practical issues of determining the extent of compensation for moral harm. Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6), 552-559;

2. Panchenko, O. I. (2023). Conditions for compensation for moral damage caused to the employee. Law and Safety, 2(89), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.2.16;

3. Panchenko, O., Yermakov, Yu., Sevruk, V., Pavlenko, S., & Oksin, V. (2024). International experience of compensation for moral damage in labor relations. Social & Legal Studios, 7(4), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2024.272;

4. Panchenko, O. I. (2022). The case-law from the ECHR regarding the compensation of moral damage to the employee. Amazonia Investiga, 11(57), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.57.09.5;

5. Chernadchuk, V. D. (2001). Compensation for moral damage in violation of labor rights [Candidate thesis abstract]. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv;

6. Soroka, O. P. (2021). Compensation for spiritual injury due to work accidents and occupational diseases [PhD thesis]. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University;

7. Porytska, Y. M. (2023). Foreign experience of the legal regulation of compensation of moral damage to the employee. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 1(79), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.1.56;

8. Tabunshikov, A. T., Akhmedov, R. M., Stepanov, D. V., Ivanova, Y. A., & Marukhno, V. M. (2020). Compensation for moral harm in foreign law and order. Opción, 36(27), 2082-2098;

9. Tapia Cornejo, B. A. S. (2022). Moral damage: Approaches from procedural doctrine. Vox Juris, 40(1), 21-46;

10. Mullany, N. J., & Handford, P. R. (1993). Tort liability for psychiatric damage. London: Butterworths;

11. Navarro-Espigares, J. L., & Segura, J. (2011). Costs and workers’ compensation for occupational accidents and diseases in Spain: A moral damage assessment perspective;

12. Behr, V. (2003). Punitive damages in American and German law: Tendencies towards approximation of apparently irreconcilable concepts. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78(1), 105-161;

13. Carucci, R., & Praslova, L. N. (2022). Employees are sick of being asked to make moral compromises. Harvard Business Review, 21 February 2022.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.