Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Abstract: The interplay between emotions and artistic truth constitutes a central concern in aesthetics and literary theory. Artistic works often communicate truth not through empirical or logical propositions but through the nuanced expression of emotional experiences. This article explores how fragments of human emotion serve as conduits for artistic truth, synthesizing perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and literary studies. Drawing on both Western and Uzbek theoretical frameworks, the study demonstrates that emotions in art function as structured, meaningful expressions that convey universal and culturally specific truths simultaneously. The findings underscore the role of emotional fragments as core units in aesthetic experience, revealing a dynamic interaction between form, feeling, and perception in artistic creation.
References
1. Bell, C. (1914). Art. London: Chatto & Windus.
2. Heyl, B. C. (1968). Artistic truth reconsidered. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 27(2), 155–163.
3. Kant, I. (1790). Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Landmann-Kalischer, E. (2017). On artistic truth. Philosophical Studies in Aesthetics, 45(1), 23–41.
5. Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., et al. (2017). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 151–165.
6. Funch, B. S. (2018). Emotions in the psychology of aesthetics. Aesthetic Research Journal, 9(3), 201–220.
7. Hamidov, M. (2020). Yulduzli Tunlar romanida tarixiy haqiqat va badiiy toʻqima. Uzbek Literary Review, 15(2), 45–62.
8. Rasulova, U. (2019). Ijodkor uslubi va badiiy mahorat. Journal of Uzbek Literary Studies, 12(1), 33–50.
9. O‘rayeva, S., Otajonova, L., & Nurullayeva, D. (2021). Mif va badiiy ijod. Central Asian Literary Studies, 7(4), 77–95.
10. Mitu, I. (2025). Kant and the aesthetic truth of poetry. Estetika Journal, 3(1), 12–29.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.